Performance · Availability · Security · Scalability

Recursive Code Review.
Continuous Quality.

Flytebit's engineering intelligence platform that monitors every pull request and commit via webhooks and CI/CD hooks - flagging issues the moment they land and feeding structured findings into a unified portal for team-wide tracking and resolution.

Automated Review 8-Category Taxonomy Zero Workflow Change

Supported Platforms

Git (native support) GitHub GitLab

What is PASSR?

PASSR (Performance, Availability, Security and Scalability - Recursive) is Flytebit's engineering intelligence platform. The Recursive in the name is deliberate: PASSR continuously monitors your codebase through webhooks and CI/CD pipeline hooks - not as a one-time snapshot, but as an always-running feedback loop.

Autonomous Background Review

  • Reviews every PR and commit automatically the moment code lands
  • 8-category taxonomy aligned to PASSR: Performance, Availability, Security, Scalability - plus correctness, architecture, code quality, and testing
  • Zero developer action required; triggered by webhooks and CI/CD hooks
  • Every issue is a complete resolution package - description, impact, and ready-to-apply fix

Unified Engineering Portal

  • Cross-repo visibility - track issues, fix rates, and trends across all repositories
  • Live dashboards - severity distribution, category breakdown, PR timelines
  • Full lifecycle tracking - every review run, issue, fix, and decision stored with visibility
  • Merge protection - block PRs with open critical issues automatically

The Code Gap

Most issues are not caught by human review - they are too subtle, too numerous, or buried in commits that never get looked at. Senior engineers spend their time on boilerplate checks while real risks go unnoticed.

Slow Review Cycles Inconsistent Standards Bugs in Production Reviewer Fatigue

Delayed Feedback

Developers wait hours to days for a first-pass review, blocking merges and slowing delivery.

Time-to-merge measured in days, not minutes.

Initial feedback in seconds, deep review follows

Inconsistent Quality

Review standards vary by reviewer, by day, and by how busy the team is.

Critical issues missed because of reviewer fatigue.

Same rigorous 8-category review on every PR

Commits Slip Through

Standalone commits on branches get zero review before they enter a PR.

Security vulnerabilities and bugs merged unnoticed.

Every commit reviewed - not just PRs

No Audit Trail

Teams have no systematic record of what was reviewed, what was fixed, and what was missed.

Engineering leaders fly blind on code quality trends.

Full lifecycle visibility in the PASSR portal

Context Switching

Senior engineers constantly interrupted to explain code and answer repetitive questions.

Deep work destroyed by boilerplate review requests.

AI handles boilerplate; humans focus on architecture

Reactive, Not Preventive

Issues are found in production or during scheduled audits - too late to prevent damage.

Post-merge bugs cost 10-100x more to fix.

Recursive monitoring on every push, every run

Everything PASSR Delivers

One platform. Eight review dimensions. Complete visibility. From the moment code lands to the moment it merges.

Security

CWE-mapped vulnerability detection: injection risks, auth failures, hardcoded secrets, JWT misconfiguration, privilege escalation.

Availability

Missing health endpoints, absent circuit breakers, no graceful shutdown, connection pool exhaustion, retry storms without backoff.

Performance

N+1 queries, blocking I/O in async paths, redundant computations, missing caching, unbounded data collection.

Scalability

Backpressure gaps, synchronous fan-out that should be parallel, stateful components that break horizontal scaling.

Architecture

God modules, leaky abstractions, SRP/DIP/OCP violations, hidden coupling - detected via tree-sitter AST parsing.

Error Handling

Unhandled exceptions, swallowed errors, missing retries and timeouts, no rollback on partial operations.

Code Quality

Excessive complexity, deep nesting, duplicated logic, magic numbers - every issue scored by severity.

Testing

Missing test coverage, brittle assertions, over-mocking, non-deterministic teardown - flagged before merge.

Portal & Analytics

Cross-repo dashboards, fix-rate tracking, severity trends, token usage, PR timelines - all in one place.

Platform Capabilities

Automated PR Description & Labeling

Structured PR summaries generated the moment a PR opens. Hybrid rule + AI labeling applied instantly - feature, bugfix, security, breaking-change, and more.

Incremental Re-Review

On every new push, only changed files are re-analysed. Fixed issues auto-resolved with commit SHA. Open ones carried forward. No duplicate noise.

Per-Issue Conversation

Developers reply to any finding to ask why, request an alternate fix, or challenge the diagnosis. Context-aware answers scoped to the exact file and function.

Merge Protection & Changelog

Block PRs with open critical issues automatically. Auto-generate and commit changelog entries on merge. No manual release notes ever again.

How PASSR Works

From webhook to resolution in five steps. Zero workflow change. Full lifecycle visibility.

1

Connect

Hook into your workflow

  • GitHub or GitLab webhook setup in minutes
  • CI/CD pipeline hooks for every run
  • Platform adapter pattern for extensibility
  • No code changes required
2

Review

Autonomous background analysis

  • Tree-sitter AST parsing at function level
  • 8-category taxonomy aligned to PASSR
  • Isolated context per code element
  • Works with any LLM via LiteLLM
3

Surface

Structured findings posted

  • Description + Impact + Fix on every issue
  • Inline suggestions on GitHub and GitLab
  • Severity and category classification
  • One-click apply for suggested fixes
4

Track

Lifecycle in the PASSR portal

  • Cross-repo issue aggregation
  • Fix rates, severity trends, PR timelines
  • LLM token usage and cost tracking
  • Date-filtered, per-PR drill-down
5

Resolve

Fix, reconcile, protect

  • Fixed issues auto-resolved on push
  • Close guard blocks critical merges
  • Changelog auto-generated on merge
  • Per-issue Q&A for deeper understanding
6

Deploy

Flexible infrastructure

  • SQLite for zero-ops single-org setup
  • PostgreSQL for enterprise multi-tenant
  • Docker, GitHub Actions, or self-hosted
  • Bring your own LLM key - full cost control

Setup in minutes. No code changes required.

Why Teams Choose PASSR

From slow, inconsistent reviews to continuous, automated quality. Transform how your engineering team ships code.

Benefit #1

Ship Faster

Get an automated first-pass review in seconds, so human reviewers focus on architecture and business logic - not boilerplate.

Before PASSR:

Hours to days waiting for review feedback. Senior engineers bogged down in trivial checks.

After PASSR:

40% reduction in PR open-to-merge time. Instant feedback before a human ever sees the diff.

40%

Faster PR-to-Merge

Automated first-pass review in seconds

30%

Fewer Post-Merge Bugs

Catch issues before they reach production

Benefit #2

Catch Bugs Early

Security vulnerabilities, null pointer exceptions, and performance issues flagged before human review - not after merge.

Before PASSR:

Bugs found in production or during slow periodic audits. Costly fixes and customer impact.

After PASSR:

30% fewer post-merge bugs. Every commit and PR reviewed automatically the moment it lands.

Benefit #3

Consistent Standards

The same rigorous 8-category review applied to every PR, every time, regardless of reviewer fatigue or team size.

Before PASSR:

Review quality varies by reviewer, by day, and by how busy the sprint is. Critical issues missed.

After PASSR:

Uniform standards across all repos. Full audit trail in the PASSR portal for compliance.

8

Review Dimensions

Same taxonomy on every PR, every time

85%+

Label Accuracy

Zero manual effort on PR labeling

Benefit #4

Zero Workflow Change

PASSR runs silently in the background. Developers keep using GitHub or GitLab exactly as they do today - no new tools to learn.

Before PASSR:

New tools mean new processes, new meetings, new overhead. Adoption struggles and pushback.

After PASSR:

Invisible background agent. Auto-generated PR descriptions and labels. Suggestions appear inline.

Benefit #5

Full Visibility

Engineering leaders get a live view of code quality across all repositories - fix rates, severity trends, and PR timelines in one portal.

Before PASSR:

"We do code review" is not a metric. No systematic tracking of what's found, fixed, or missed.

After PASSR:

Cross-repo dashboards, fix-rate trends, and per-PR drill-down. Because fix rate is the metric that matters.

Cross-Repo Visibility

One portal for all repositories and teams

BYO LLM

Full Control

Your model, your key, your infrastructure

Benefit #6

Cost-Effective & Private

Works with any LLM via LiteLLM - OpenAI, Anthropic, Groq, or self-hosted models. Your code never has to leave your infrastructure.

Before PASSR:

Expensive per-seat SaaS tools. Code sent to third-party APIs with no control over data residency.

After PASSR:

Self-host with Ollama or vLLM. SQLite for zero-ops. Full control over models, costs, and data.

Closed Beta

Ready for continuous code quality?

PASSR is currently in closed beta. Join engineering teams that are already shipping faster with fewer bugs and full visibility.

Request Beta Access

No commitment. We'll reach out within 24 hours.